Hong Kong’s Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements

Hong Kong’s Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements

Hong Kong has established Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs) with various nations to prevent double taxation and financial misconduct. These agreements promote cooperation with global tax authorities, impacting residents of Hong Kong and partner countries.


Critical points of Hong Kong's DTAs:

  • Eliminate double taxation from overlapping tax jurisdictions.
  • Clarify tax rules for international transactions.
  • Resolve conflicts over taxpayer residence and income source.
  • Provide avenues to address taxation issues.
  • Prevent income flow tax avoidance.
  • Enhance investment, trade, and personnel movement by reducing foreign withholding tax rates.

Double taxation occurs when income or profits are subject to taxation in multiple jurisdictions, leading to the same earnings being taxed more than once. Hong Kong residents do not face this issue and typically do not experience double taxation.

Double taxation agreement network

Double taxation, where income or profits are taxed in multiple jurisdictions, can create complex financial burdens. However, Hong Kong has established a unique taxation framework known as the territoriality basis, where only income or profit generated within its borders is subject to taxation. Income derived from sources outside Hong Kong by residents is generally exempt from tax. Therefore, Hong Kong residents typically avoid the specter of double taxation.

WATCH

Maximize Profits in Your Dividend Repatriation by Leveraging the PRC-HK DTA

Furthermore, despite their worldwide taxation approach, many countries provide their residents operating businesses in Hong Kong with unilateral tax credit relief. Hong Kong even allows a deduction for foreign taxes paid on income that is also subject to Hong Kong taxation. This system dramatically alleviates concerns about double taxation for businesses operating within the region.

Nevertheless, the Hong Kong SAR government acknowledges the value of entering into comprehensive Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs) with its trading partners. These agreements clarify tax rights, help investors assess potential tax liabilities for their economic activities, and serve as an enticing incentive for overseas and Hong Kong-based companies to engage in international business.

As of 1 November 2024, Hong Kong has inked comprehensive DTAs with 51 countries and regions. Additionally, negotiations for such agreements are ongoing with 17 more, including jurisdictions like Germany, Norway, and Cyprus.

A unique challenge arises for airline operators due to the global nature of their operations, making them particularly vulnerable to double taxation. Recognizing the lengthy process of DTA negotiations, Hong Kong has adopted a policy of incorporating double taxation relief provisions for airline income into bilateral Air Services Agreements reached with aviation partners.

Shipping income is another area of concern. Hong Kong is actively negotiating double taxation relief for shipping income, particularly with jurisdictions that do not offer reciprocal tax exemptions or prefer bilateral agreements despite having such provisions. Some agreements even encompass both airline and shipping income.

Hong Kong’s onshore-offshore tax regime has garnered attention for its potential to reduce tax burdens by pricing intra-group transactions within Hong Kong companies. However, this has attracted increased scrutiny from the Hong Kong Inland Revenue Department (IRD) in recent years.

In response, the government introduced the Advance Pricing Arrangement (APA) program in 2012. This program, seen as a positive step for multinational companies, allows taxpayers to engage with tax authorities transparently and non-adversarially to achieve an optimal tax outcome. Notably, Hong Kong can only initiate an APA program with another country after signing a DTA with that country, further emphasizing the importance of these international agreements.

List of DTA agreements

Hong Kong has signed comprehensive DTAs with 51 countries or regions. In addition, Hong Kong is negotiating comprehensive DTAs with 17 countries or regions, such as Germany, Norway, Cyprus, and Turkey.

Countries and Regions with Existing Comprehensive DTAs with Hong Kong

A-I

J-N

O-Z

Austria

Japan

Pakistan

Belarus

Jersey

Portugal

Belgium

Korea

Qatar

Brunei

Kuwait

Romania

Cambodia

Latvia

Russia

Canada

Liechtenstein

Saudi Arabia

Czech

Luxembourg

Serbia

Estonia

Macao SAR

South Africa

Finland

Mainland of China

Spain

France

Malaysia

Switzerland

Georgia

Malta

Thailand

Guernsey

Mexico

Türkiye

Hungary

Netherlands

United Arab Emirates

India

New Zealand

United Kingdom

Indonesia

 

Vietnam

Ireland

 

 

Italy

 

 

Countries and Regions with DTAs Under Negotiation with Hong Kong

Country / Region

Included in Information 1 (Countries and Regions with DTAs Under Negotiation)

Listed in Information 2 (Negotiations Scheduled)

Azerbaijan

No

Yes

Bahrain

Yes

No

Bangladesh

Yes

No

Cabo Verde

No

Yes

Cyprus

Yes

Yes

Germany

Yes

Yes

Israel

Yes

Yes

Jordan

No

Yes

Kyrgyz Republic

Yes

Yes

Lithuania

Yes

Yes

Maldives

Yes

Yes

Mongolia

No

Yes

Mauritius

Yes

No

Nigeria

Yes

Yes

North Macedonia

Yes

Yes

Norway

Yes

Yes

Rwanda

No

Yes

Turkmenistan

No

Yes

Ukraine

Yes

Yes

Venezuela

No

Yes

 

Tax rates for dividends, interest, royalties, and technical fees under DTAs

The following table shows the maximum tax rates those countries/regions with Comprehensive DTAs with Hong Kong can charge a Hong Kong resident on payments of dividends, interest, royalties, and technical fees.

Country / Region

Effective From

Dividends - Qualifying Companies (%)

Dividends - Others (%)

Interest (%)

Royalties (%)

Technical Fees (%)

Armenia

Pending

0

5

5

5

NA

Austria

Year of Assessment 2012/2013

0

10

-

3

NA

Bahrain

Pending

-

-

-

5

NA

Bangladesh

Pending

10

15

10

10

10

Belarus

Year of Assessment 2018/2019

5

5

5

03/05

NA

Belgium

Year of Assessment 2004/2005

0/5

15

10

5

NA

Brunei

Year of Assessment 2011/2012

-

-

-

05/10

15

Cambodia

Year of Assessment 2020/2021

10

10

10

10

10

Canada

Year of Assessment 2014/2015

5

15

10

10

NA

Croatia

Pending

5

5

5

5

NA

Czech

Year of Assessment 2013/2014

5

5

-

10

NA

Estonia

Year of Assessment 2020/2021

0

10

0/10

5

NA

Finland

Year of Assessment 2019/2020

5

10

-

3

NA

France

Year of Assessment 2012/2013

10

10

10

10

NA

Georgia

Year of Assessment 2022/2023

5

5

5

5

NA

Guernsey

Year of Assessment 2014/2015

-

-

-

4

NA

Hungary

Year of Assessment 2012/2013

5

10

5

5

NA

India

Year of Assessment 2019/2020

5

5

10

10

10

Indonesia

Year of Assessment 2013/2014

5

10

10

5

NA

Ireland

Year of Assessment 2012/2013

-

-

10

3

NA

Italy

Year of Assessment 2016/2017

10

10

12.5

15

NA

Japan

Year of Assessment 2012/2013

5

10

10

5

NA

Jersey

Year of Assessment 2014/2015

-

-

-

4

NA

Korea

Year of Assessment 2017/2018

10

15

10

10

NA

Kuwait

Year of Assessment 2014/2015

5

5

5

5

NA

Latvia

Year of Assessment 2018/2019

0

10

0/10

0/3

NA

Liechtenstein

Year of Assessment 2012/2013

-

-

-

3

NA

Luxembourg

Year of Assessment 2008/2009

0

10

-

3

NA

Macao SAR

Year of Assessment 2021/2022

5

5

5

3

NA

Mainland of China

Year of Assessment 2007/2008

5

10

7

5/7

NA

Malaysia

Year of Assessment 2013/2014

5

10

10

8

5

Malta

Year of Assessment 2013/2014

-

-

-

3

NA

Mauritius

Year of Assessment 2024/2025

0

-

5

5

NA

Mexico

Year of Assessment 2014/2015

-

-

4.9/10

10

NA

Netherlands

Year of Assessment 2012/2013

0

10

-

3

NA

New Zealand

Year of Assessment 2012/2013

0/5

15

10

5

NA

Pakistan

Year of Assessment 2018/2019

10

10

10

10

12.5

Portugal

Year of Assessment 2013/2014

5

10

10

5

NA

Qatar

Year of Assessment 2014/2015

-

-

-

5

NA

Romania

Income derived on or after 01.01.2017

3

5

3

3

NA

Russia

Year of Assessment 2017/2018

0/5

10

-

3

NA

Saudi Arabia

Year of Assessment 2019/2020

5

5

-

5/8

NA

Serbia

Year of Assessment 2021/2022

5

10

10

5/10

NA

South Africa

Year of Assessment 2016/2017

5

10

10

5

NA

Spain

Year of Assessment 2013/2014

0

10

5

5

NA

Switzerland

Year of Assessment 2013/2014

0

10

-

3

NA

Thailand

Year of Assessment 2006/2007

10

10/15

5/10/15

NA

Türkiye

Pending

5

10

7.5/10

7.5/10

NA

United Arab Emirates

Year of Assessment 2016/2017

5

10

5

5

NA

United Kingdom

Year of Assessment 2011/2012

0/15

0/15

Domestic rate

3

NA

Vietnam

Year of Assessment 2010/2011

10

10

10

7/10

NA

Double taxation elimination methods

The methods of eliminating double taxation are stipulated in the specific DTA or a country’s domestic law.

Tax credit method

In most treaties signed by Hong Kong, residents can avoid double taxation through a tax credit.

Under the credit method, Hong Kong SAR shall grant credit for the tax paid in a foreign jurisdiction outside of Hong Kong regarding income derived by a person who is a resident of the Hong Kong SAR from sources of that foreign jurisdiction.

However, the credit should not exceed the amount of Hong Kong SAR’s tax computed for that income following the tax laws.

Tax exemption method

In addition to tax credit relief, double taxation can be eliminated by tax exemption methods, reduced tax rates, as well as relief by deductions. However, these methods are not used as commonly as the tax credit method.

Who can enjoy the benefits of DTAs?

Under most DTAs, only Hong Kong residents can claim tax benefits under the comprehensive DTAs. Taxpayers should refer to the protocol of the relevant DTA to check whether they qualify as Hong Kong residents.

In general, the following individuals can be regarded as Hong Kong Residents and thus can enjoy DTA benefits:

  • Any individual who stays in Hong Kong for more than 180 days during a year of assessment or for more than 300 days in two consecutive years of assessment, one of which is the relevant year of assessment;
  • Company / partnership / trust / body of persons incorporated or constituted in Hong Kong; and,
  • Company / partnership / trust / body of persons incorporated or constituted outside Hong Kong but managed or controlled in Hong Kong.

Applying for Certificate of Resident Status

A Certificate of Resident Status is a document issued by the competent authority of the Hong Kong SAR to a resident who requires proof of resident status to claim tax benefits under the comprehensive DTA.

The Certificate of Resident Status should constitute sufficient proof of the resident status of a Hong Kong resident. The competent authority of Hong Kong will issue a Certificate of Resident Status after the DTA between Hong Kong and the relevant jurisdiction has become effective.

Did You Know
Generally, only one Certificate of Resident Status will be issued to an entity regarding each DTA for each year.

Applicants should be aware that a Certificate of Resident Status issue will not guarantee that they will succeed in their claim to benefits under the relevant DTA. It will be up to the treaty partner to determine whether all the applicable conditions are fulfilled and benefits can be granted.

To apply for the Certificate of Resident Status, the applicant needs to complete the appropriate form:

DTA Partner

Form

 

Company / Partnership / Trust / Body of Persons

Individual

The Mainland of China (Mainland)

IR1313A (06/2023)

IR1314A (06/2023)

Other Jurisdictions

IR1313B (06/2023)

IR1314B (06/2023)

The completed form should be sent to the Tax Treaty Section of the IRD, and a Certificate of Resident Status shall be issued within 21 working days after receipt of a properly completed application. If further information is needed or the application cannot be accepted, a notification of decision by the assessing officer will be given within the timeframe.

Advance Pricing Agreements

Hong Kong’s onshore-offshore tax regime often reduces the tax burden for those who operate through Hong Kong companies by pricing intra-group transactions. This has led to heightened transfer pricing scrutiny from the Hong Kong Inland Revenue Department in recent years.

Consequently, the Advance Pricing Arrangement (APA) program was introduced to Hong Kong. It was widely regarded as a welcome development for multinational companies, as it offers a non-adversarial approach in which taxpayers can transparently engage with tax authorities to achieve an optimal tax outcome.

An APA is an agreement that determines an appropriate set of criteria (e.g., transfer pricing method, external data, reasonable adjustments, critical assumptions as to future events) to determine the pricing of related party transactions over a fixed period. This is either three or five years.

Hong Kong can only start an APA program with another country after signing a DTA with the concerned country.

CHANGE SECTION

Events in China

How can we help?

Hi there!

Let me show you how I can be of assistance.

I can help you find and connect with an advisor, get guidance, search resources, or share feedback about this site.

Please select what you’d like to do:

Typing...
How can we help?

Hi there!

Our contact personel in Italy is:

profile Alberto Vettoretti

Please select what you’d like to do:

Typing...
Let us help you advance in Asia

Typing...
Speak to an expert!

Please share a few details about what guidance you seek. We can have a suitable advisor contact you within one business day.

Security Check
Back to top